Just your stereotypical 22 year old, 6 foot, Homosexual, Atheist, Trekkie, Mexican-American, Progressive, Liberal, Tea loving, Politico.

San Diego/Chula Vista
<3

Studying for a degree in Business.
Currently a General Manager for Teavana

Things you will find on this blog:
-Intelligent opinions backed by facts
-Star Trek and all its slash
-Men in various states of undress
-A few personal posts
-Photos/graphs regarding cities and infrastructure
-Lots of tea
-What happens to be popular on tumblr at the time

 

Day trip to no where with @chentzzz #california (at Point Loma)

Day trip to no where with @chentzzz #california (at Point Loma)

Another day in the life. So happy with the progress of my new team! #teavana #teasofourlives #california  (at Teavana)

Another day in the life. So happy with the progress of my new team! #teavana #teasofourlives #california (at Teavana)

#BBC is getting sassy! #lovesit #totes #california

#BBC is getting sassy! #lovesit #totes #california

A new Democratic bill would raise minimum wage to $10.10/hour. Sign the petition in support!

requiem1010:

argusofinsight:

requiem1010:

chocolate-chip-muffinz:

Seems like a good idea, yes.

It seems like a good idea until you actually think about it. By raising the minimum wage to $10.10, you are effectively reducing the wages of those that make above minimum wage. You’re telling people that their labor is now worth $X dollars- their wages don’t rise, percentage-wise in accordance with minimum wage laws.

Not only that, but there will be an immediate rise in the cost of consumer products. More money in the supply lessens the spending power of the money in circulation.

Want the math?

Example: I make $10, while another person, Steve makes $8, and Suzy makes $12. By increasing the minimum wage, it at first seems I am getting a 1% raise, Steve is getting a 25% raise, and Suzy stays at the same level.

However, the value of Suzy’s labor has been effectively reduced by almost 16%. How is this fair to people making more than minimum wage?

On to the law of supply and demand-

Example, simplified:

Let’s say that everyone makes $7.25. Now, we increase that wage to $10.10, an increase of almost 28%. Sounds great! Everyone is making more money!

Except they’re not. The prices of goods and services will rise equal to the amount of the money in the supply.

I feel that minimum wage should be abolished altogether- the market should dictate the dollar amount of the wage, not the government. Minimum wage is not meant to be a career wage. If your skill sets dictate that you’re only worth minimum wage, then that’s what you earn. If you want to make more money, make yourself more valuable and learn new skills (which one can do, for free, online).

Don’t raise the minimum wage.

The minimum wage should be replaced with a living wage. If you set the value of labor below what it costs to live, the government will pay out welfare, housing, and food stamp benefits to those that earn less than that.

The means that the federal government, and therefore the tax payers (Suzy), are paying the costs of the private sector underpaying their workers (Steve). Whether or not a person works, they still have basic needs that need to be met. Working helps them pay for those needs themselves.

My company is changing the pay structure to adjust to markets that already have increased the minimum wages (ex. San Francisco) Those that were already getting paid at a higher rate (Suzy) are having their pay adjusted to stay proportional to what it was before. Prices have not been affected but sales have increased in those areas as people have more money to spend (Steve).

Don’t even get me started about students. How are they supposed to increase the value of their labor through education if they can’t afford to live let alone attend school? Not everyone has a family or lives in a low cost of living area. Not everyone will be eligible for a loan. Not everyone will be able to work 40 weeks.

Replacing the minimum wage with a living wage restores the income distribution to what it was during the 1950’s. Our national wealth, stock markets, corporate profits, GDP, worker productivity, and executive compensation have all skyrocketed since that period. The one thing that has remained mostly flat is employee pay, especially for those near the bottom.

You do not understand the concept of the supply of money. If everyone’s pay rises proportionally, the value of everyone’s money depreciates by the same percentage.

Do you acknowledge the income gap in the United States? Do you acknowledge that it is worse than Mexico?

Those near the top have had their income rise almost without interruption for the last 50 years. Those at the bottom who are producing all the value, those that are selling things, those that are making cars, and building house, have not had their income rise proportionally. Their income and their labor is continuously devalued through inflation.

We are talking about the 3.8 million workers who make minimum wage or less in the U.S. These are the people who need to claim federal, state, and local assistance. That is 5% of hourly workers or 2.6% of the total work force.

Raising their pay to a living wage doesn’t devalue anyone’s pay. It adjusts to where it once was and should be. Those near the minimum wage would have their pay adjusted upwards to reflect the new value of their labor.

These workers that receive this living wage will be able to pay their basic bills, buy food, gas, pay for services and stop draining the public assistance programs we all pay for. Maybe thy could afford health care? Their new income would directly stimulate the economy.

Adjusting the pay for 2.6% of the work force helps narrow the pay gap. I have a hard time believing a CEO of a corporation would ask for an extra $1,000,000 in his salary because his pay was “depreciated”. He gets his raise whether or not the company is profitable and regardless of what his lowest paid employees get paid. 

NOT EVERYONES PAY WILL APPRECIATE. 2.6% of the work force that cost tax payers the most. 1.2% of the U.S. population.

OR we can keep borrowing and taxing to pay for these programs that have billions of dollars in waste.

btw. A living wage in my community (San Diego) for a single person is $11.38 (LOOK OUT BIG SPENDER). State minimum wage is $8.00. We aren’t talking about a lot here.

(Source: sanityscraps)

Calculated Risk: The California Budget Surplus

wontoo3fore:

So are the people who blamed liberals for the budget crisis, which was mostly driven by the length and depth of the recession now going to the praise Brown and the liberal majorities in the state for the structural reforms which put the state in surplus? Not going to hold my breath.

I feel really uncomfortable with the San Onofre nuclear power plants (AKA The boobs)
Sure, they might be earthquake resistant but what happens when the big one hits?
Or, if like Japan, we get hit by a tsunami? I really don&#8217;t like the idea of San Diego having to be evacuated. 

I feel really uncomfortable with the San Onofre nuclear power plants (AKA The boobs)

Sure, they might be earthquake resistant but what happens when the big one hits?

Or, if like Japan, we get hit by a tsunami? I really don’t like the idea of San Diego having to be evacuated.